<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<title>Biblioteka Współczesnej Myśli Pedagogicznej ; 2</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/11716/98" rel="alternate"/>
<subtitle/>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/11716/98</id>
<updated>2026-04-29T07:09:14Z</updated>
<dc:date>2026-04-29T07:09:14Z</dc:date>
<entry>
<title>Polityka państw członkowskich i prawne instrumenty Unii Europejskiej na rzecz równouprawnienia płci w edukacji</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/11716/202" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Wojniak, Justyna</name>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/11716/202</id>
<updated>2022-05-16T08:17:35Z</updated>
<published>2013-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Polityka państw członkowskich i prawne instrumenty Unii Europejskiej na rzecz równouprawnienia płci w edukacji
Wojniak, Justyna
The issue of gender inequality in education is of interest not only educational researchers,&#13;
as it was also reviewed by the European Commission, which makes this issue an&#13;
important element of EU policy. The paper examines the status of implementation and&#13;
draft programs of gender policy in education in selected European Union countries, most&#13;
of which has taken such initiatives. It is worth to underline that among the countries&#13;
that have not developed such programs are Estonia, Italy, Hungary and Slovakia, as well&#13;
as Poland. The commitment to implement programs preventing gender discrimination&#13;
in education derives from the adoption of the law of the European Union (acquis&#13;
communautaire), particularly in the field of gender equality. Therefore, an overview of the&#13;
acts of the European Union legislation (treatises, directives and recommendations) seems&#13;
necessary, as well as examples of initiatives undertaken due to availability of EU funds&#13;
intended for anti-discrimination projects, which is an additional factor inspiring efforts&#13;
of the governments of the Member States in this area.
</summary>
<dc:date>2013-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Zasady partnerstwa wychowawczego i ich realizacja w austriackich Wioskach dziecięcych SOS</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/11716/201" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Chepil, Oresta</name>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/11716/201</id>
<updated>2022-05-16T08:20:26Z</updated>
<published>2013-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Zasady partnerstwa wychowawczego i ich realizacja w austriackich Wioskach dziecięcych SOS
Chepil, Oresta
Pedagogy and psychology of vitality are in the center of SOS-Kinderdorf upbringing&#13;
work. This includes the active involvement of a child into the upbringing process on the&#13;
basis of partnership, cooperation, intercourse, high demands as well as respect and mutual&#13;
understanding. The cooperation of the subjects of the upbringing process (mothers and&#13;
children) is the integral part of the interconnected components: pedagogically adjusted&#13;
conditions, means, personally aimed techniques, activity with the help of which the social&#13;
demand is carried out. Social mobility as well as readiness to act on the basis of partnership,&#13;
mutual understanding and support are formed.
</summary>
<dc:date>2013-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Czy biurokracja oświatowa może wspierać kreatywną alternatywę dla tradycyjnej szkoły?</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/11716/200" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Mazurek, Kas</name>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/11716/200</id>
<updated>2022-05-16T08:22:34Z</updated>
<published>2013-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Czy biurokracja oświatowa może wspierać kreatywną alternatywę dla tradycyjnej szkoły?
Mazurek, Kas
Public, state-funded schools are by definition large bureaucracies. The consequence is&#13;
that individual schools in the system tend to be rather uniform – in curriculum, pedagogy,&#13;
evaluation, administration and so on. A structural and organizational framework exists,&#13;
individual schools must fit into that framework. The result is that educational experiments&#13;
and innovations are most often found outside the public school sector – in private schools.&#13;
But, do public school system necessarily have to be conservative institutions? Is it possible&#13;
to encourage and support a wide variety of innovative schools, different philosophies of&#13;
education, qualitatively different pedagogies, and so on, within one public, state-funded,&#13;
government-directed, school system? In other words, is it possible for the bureaucracy&#13;
and structure of a public school system to be sufficiently open and dynamic that it can&#13;
encourage and support creative and sometimes radically different education alternatives?&#13;
The answer is ‘yes’. The administrative and legal structure of schooling in Alberta,&#13;
Canada, provides a real-life example of the thesis that, at least to some degree, large&#13;
education bureaucracies can encourage creative opportunities.
</summary>
<dc:date>2013-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Kreatívne písanie a jeho význam pri vyučovaní cudzieho jazyka</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/11716/199" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Smetanová, Eva</name>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/11716/199</id>
<updated>2022-05-16T08:24:38Z</updated>
<published>2013-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Kreatívne písanie a jeho význam pri vyučovaní cudzieho jazyka
Smetanová, Eva
Writing (as one of the four language skills – listening, speaking, reading and writing)&#13;
has always been a part of school curriculum for a certain foreign language. The skills,&#13;
however, do not stand on their own during foreign language acquisition and are rarely&#13;
taught individually. Most of the time they are integrated, overlapped and they mutually&#13;
complement one another. One of the basic questions is how to teach the student to&#13;
write in a foreign language. It is vital to understand that writing (not only in a foreign&#13;
language) has its specific features and aspects and it is different from the other skills. Not&#13;
less important is to know what kind of writing we take into account. Writing as a skill can&#13;
have various purposes – from teaching and practising grammar structures to writing itself,&#13;
which may be the key aim of the educational process (such academic or creative writing).&#13;
It may take quite long to the writer to learn how to write and to reach the final product.&#13;
Writing, together with speaking, is a productive skill. It differs from speaking as it gives&#13;
more time to the writer to produce the final piece of his/her work. It enables the writer to&#13;
think over what he/she is going to write and how to write it, the writer could change his/&#13;
her ideas, register, attitude, to correct or modify the information without a reader noticing&#13;
it – which is not possible when speaking.
</summary>
<dc:date>2013-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
</feed>
