<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/11716/13014">
<title>2011, Studia Politologica 6</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/11716/13014</link>
<description/>
<items>
<rdf:Seq>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hdl.handle.net/11716/13034"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hdl.handle.net/11716/13033"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hdl.handle.net/11716/13032"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hdl.handle.net/11716/13031"/>
</rdf:Seq>
</items>
<dc:date>2026-04-09T11:47:33Z</dc:date>
</channel>
<item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/11716/13034">
<title>Postkomunistyczna lewica, to znaczy jaka?</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/11716/13034</link>
<description>Postkomunistyczna lewica, to znaczy jaka?
Godlewski, Tadeusz
The first part of the article includes an analysis of the term: post-communist parties (postcommunists),&#13;
used in political discourse in the 1990s and in the present decade as a pejorative&#13;
designatum of the opponent, i.e. the parties: the Social Democracy of the Republic of Poland&#13;
(Socjaldemokracja Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej, SdRP) and the Democratic Left Alliance (Sojusz&#13;
Lewicy Demokratycznej, SLD). More diverse were the intentions of the authors of the&#13;
scientific and journalistic texts. The latter part of the present article indicates some of the&#13;
indirect manifestations of the "post-communist" continuation of the Polish United Workers'&#13;
Party in the analysis of the members and staff of the SLD. Discontinuity was pronounced in&#13;
the erosion of ideology and programme evolution towards social liberalism until mid-200S.&#13;
The "historical policy" of the Law and Justice party (Prawo i Sprawiedliwosc, PiS) in the&#13;
middle of the current decade was also an ideological offensive in the area of the memory of&#13;
the communist regime, in the face of which the SLD turned out to be defensive and ineffective.&#13;
The final part of the text reports the manifestations of maintaining the historical traditions by&#13;
the Democratic Left Alliance: the people, ideas, cutting-edge events. The conclusions highlight&#13;
the political rivalry for control over the codes of historical memory. The memory of the past is&#13;
seen as a viable segment of the policy in the present time, and part of the vision of the future&#13;
in the medium and long term perspective. The term 'post-communist', as used in the title, has&#13;
in this context been an instrument effectively used by the right wing in order to delegitimize&#13;
the SLD in the last two decades.
</description>
<dc:date>2011-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/11716/13033">
<title>Modernizacja i regres w myśli liberałów w Polsce w latach 80.</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/11716/13033</link>
<description>Modernizacja i regres w myśli liberałów w Polsce w latach 80.
Karnowska, Danuta
In the 1980s Poland saw the rise of the liberal trend of political thought represented by&#13;
a different environments. Among the most important ones were: Krakow, Gdansk and&#13;
Warsaw. The thoughts and activities of their representatives showed a clear tendency for&#13;
the modernization of the country that was against the principles created by the opposition&#13;
centered around the "Solidarity". The basic postulates concerning the direction of the&#13;
modernization included primarily economic transformation towards the free market,&#13;
considering that by introducing free market principles it is possible to educate the society&#13;
in democratic rules and procedures. At the same time, the creation and the activities of&#13;
the "Solidarity" were considered a sign of decline by the liberal circles as, according to the&#13;
liberals, the postulates of that organization denied the possibility of the country getting out of&#13;
the crisis and of development.
</description>
<dc:date>2011-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/11716/13032">
<title>Jaka pamięć Polski Ludowej jest nam potrzebna?</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/11716/13032</link>
<description>Jaka pamięć Polski Ludowej jest nam potrzebna?
Stobiecki, Rafał
Collective memory is never monolithic; through its involvement in culture, numerous&#13;
relations to the present, it is a conglomerate of different types of beliefs, sometimes mutually&#13;
complementary, sometimes conflicting. Such is also the case of the memory of the People’s&#13;
Republic of Poland (PRL). The aim of this paper is critical analysis of the two forms of memory&#13;
of the PRL that are dominant in public discourse. One is called by the author „accusing memory”&#13;
while the other is „nostalgic-ironic memory”. Each has its particular characteristics, reflected&#13;
in its characteristic language and symbols, each refers to a different axiology and tries to&#13;
conceptualize the main threads of the memory of the People’s Republic of Poland in a different&#13;
way and, finally, each is addressed to a different audience. Since both memory formulas have&#13;
their limitations, raise doubts and do not allow for sufficient „taming” „working”, „overcoming”&#13;
that historical experience of the People’s Republic of Poland that several generations of Poles&#13;
had to face, the author proposes a different concept of memory in their place: „conciliatory&#13;
memory”. It is based on the idea of intergenerational dialogue, gives an opportunity to&#13;
„depoliticize” the past and a possibility to include various perspectives in the creation of the&#13;
proposed, multi-dimensional image of the People’s Republic of Poland.
</description>
<dc:date>2011-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/11716/13031">
<title>PRL – historyczna zapaść czy złożona rzeczywistość? Współczesne debaty</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/11716/13031</link>
<description>PRL – historyczna zapaść czy złożona rzeczywistość? Współczesne debaty
Magierska, Anna
Talking about the People’s Republic of Poland requires special precautions. It is necessary&#13;
to be aware of conditions that hinder the formulation of answers to questions important&#13;
for the assessment of the past. One should note, among others, the following issues:&#13;
sovereignty or occupation, an alternative to the seizure of power by the communists,&#13;
the postwar revolution, economic changes, the nature of the system (socialist or&#13;
totalitarian), transformation of society. Talking about the past on scientific grounds&#13;
is also complicated by the use of imprecise terminology (e.g. frequent identification&#13;
of real socialism with communism). Making attempts to balance the PRL is also&#13;
a result of entanglement of history in politics. The desire to reduce history to a source of&#13;
arguments for current policy decisions, or a lack of clarity about whether it is also the duty of&#13;
historians to judge the past, push the main task – the task of explanation – to the background.&#13;
Further difficulties arise from frequently different value systems of the disputants.&#13;
Generally, there are two approaches: recognition of the period of the People’s Republic of&#13;
Poland as permanent regression or assuming that – irrespective of the system – that period&#13;
left something of value that needs to be described and assessed in a fair way. It is, for example,&#13;
worth seeing how – from the perspective of the changes taking place after 1989 – people&#13;
assessed the PRL and how the socio-economic reforms gained people’s understanding,&#13;
coincided with their beliefs, their value system, which was after all to a large extent shaped&#13;
in those years.
</description>
<dc:date>2011-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>
