dc.contributor.author | Bal-Nowak, Maria | pl_PL |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-03-19T20:09:06Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-03-19T20:09:06Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2005 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Annales Academiae Paedagogicae Cracoviensis. 30, Studia Philosophica 2 (2005), s. [14]-21 | pl_PL |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11716/6983 | |
dc.description.abstract | The article deals with the key concept of noumenon in Kant’s philosophy and consequences of its transposition by
philosophers from Marburg school of neo-Kantianism, especially Cohen and Natorp. Assuming the existence of science,
they depart from Kant’s assumptions of transcendental method because they are occupied with discovering the
structure of objective knowledge, “the spirit of scientificity.” According to Marburg philosophers, transcendental
philosophy consists in the analysis of conscience and its products; they deny the reality of noumenon treating it
as a borderline concept and not as a source of impressions for constructing the subject of cognition, which was
obvious for Kant. Such an approach results in a different idea of knowledge, its source and nature, and hence of
the whole reality. | en_EN |
dc.language.iso | pl | pl_PL |
dc.title | Negacja noumenu i jej konsekwencje. Kwestia obiektywności poznania w szkole marburskiej | pl_PL |
dc.title.alternative | Denial of Noumenon and Its Consequenca The Issue of Objectivity of Cognition in Marburg School | en_EN |
dc.type | Article | pl_PL |