Pokaż uproszczony rekord

dc.contributor.authorPacholska, Annapl_PL
dc.contributor.authorUjma, Maciejpl_PL
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-21T14:09:30Z
dc.date.available2022-03-21T14:09:30Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationAnnales Universitatis Paedagogicae Cracoviensis. 302, Studia de Securitate 10 (1) (2020), s. [132]-158pl_PL
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11716/10942
dc.description.abstractThe last 5 years have brought significant changes in legal regulations of primary importance for the judiciary in Poland. For the subjective sense of legal security of a citizen, his conviction that he is duly protected by the legislator is of key importance. From this perspective, not only the content of legal norms, but also the process of their creation should be considered relevant from this perspective. Therefore, justifications of bills that can be described as the voice of the legislator itself are important for the legislator’s understanding of the motives and reasons for changing it. The purpose of this article is to determine whether and how significant for the subjective legal security of justifying draft bills of significant importance for the functioning of the Polish justice system.en_EN
dc.language.isoplpl_PL
dc.subjectTrybunał Konstytucyjnypl_PL
dc.subjectSąd Najwyższypl_PL
dc.subjectbezpieczeństwo prawnepl_PL
dc.subjectuzasadnienie projektu nowelizacjipl_PL
dc.subjectustrój sądów powszechnychpl_PL
dc.subjectConstitutional Tribunalen_EN
dc.subjectSupreme Courten_EN
dc.subjectlegal securityen_EN
dc.subjectjustification of the draft amendmenten_EN
dc.subjectsystem of common courtsen_EN
dc.titlePięć lat zmian w polskim sądownictwie z perspektywy bezpieczeństwa prawnegopl_PL
dc.title.alternative5 years of changes in the Polish judiciary from the perspective of legal securityen_EN
dc.typeArticlepl_PL


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord