• polski
    • English
  • polski 
    • polski
    • English
  • Zaloguj
Zobacz pozycję 
  •   Strona główna Repozytorium Uniwersytetu Komisji Edukacji Narodowej
  • Czasopisma Naukowe
  • Annales Academiae/Universitatis Paedagogicae Cracoviensis
  • Studia Historica
  • 2001, Studia Historica 1
  • Zobacz pozycję
  •   Strona główna Repozytorium Uniwersytetu Komisji Edukacji Narodowej
  • Czasopisma Naukowe
  • Annales Academiae/Universitatis Paedagogicae Cracoviensis
  • Studia Historica
  • 2001, Studia Historica 1
  • Zobacz pozycję
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Walka o tron polski po śmierci Jana III Sobieskiego w świetle literatury politycznej

Thumbnail
Oglądaj/Otwórz
Walka o tron polski... (637.9KB)
Autor:
Niedziela, Rafał
Źródło: Annales Academiae Paedagogicae Cracoviensis. 3, Studia Historica 1 (2001), s. [33]-45
Język: pl
Data: 2001
Metadata
Pokaż pełny rekord
Streszczenie
A long interregnum period following the death of Jan III Sobieski contributed to the development of political writings. Letters, which were written then, reflected the moods of the Polish gentry and testified to the character of the epoch. To a degree, they also made an impact on the outcome of the struggle for the Polish throne. The most serious candidates to succeed to the throne were Prince Jakub Sobieski, son of the deceased ruler, and Francis Louis de Bourbon, nephew of Great Conde, Prince Conti, who was supported by the French diplomatic circles. The Polish nobility held the strong opinion that one of those pretenders would take the highest position in the country. Consequently, the two were in the midst of a fierce political struggle. His supporters presented Jakub as a son of a powerful monarch and a warranty of good relationships with Poland’s neighbours. They emphasised the fact that it had always been kings’ sons who were the successors to the Polish throne until that time. The opponents accused the candidate of striving to obtain foreign military help and of a too strong attachment to Austria. Prince Conti, as viewed by the supporters of France was an exquisite commander, who was in possession of great wealth and who was excellently prepared to be a ruler. Many sources, however, questioned both his ruling talent and his financial promise. Some doubt was also expressed that the Republic of Poland would get involved in a conflict with the neighbouring states after his election on the instigation of Versailles. The “pen struggle” about the two pretenders turned out to be rather destructive. It exposed their merits and faults and their satirical image. The Saxon elector, Frederick August I Wettin, who unexpectedly put forward his own candidature in 1697 managed to avoid the commotion. He was almost completely unknown by the Polish nobles, which paradoxically turned out to his advantage. Before the political struggle reached him, thanks to his determination, military power, and support of the Republic’s neighbours he succeeded to the throne and strengthened his rule soon afterwards.
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/11716/5677
Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach
  • 2001, Studia Historica 1

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Kontakt z nami | Wyślij uwagi

Deklaracja dostępności
Theme by 
Atmire NV
Logo
Budowa Repozytorium Uniwersytetu Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie została sfinansowana ze środków Ministerstwa Nauki i Szkolnictwa Wyższego na działalność upowszechniającą naukę.

Image
 

 

Przeglądaj

Całe RepozytoriumZbiory i kolekcje Daty wydaniaAutorzyTytułyTematyTa kolekcjaDaty wydaniaAutorzyTytułyTematy

Moje konto

Zaloguj

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Kontakt z nami | Wyślij uwagi

Deklaracja dostępności
Theme by 
Atmire NV
Logo
Budowa Repozytorium Uniwersytetu Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie została sfinansowana ze środków Ministerstwa Nauki i Szkolnictwa Wyższego na działalność upowszechniającą naukę.

Image