| dc.contributor.author | Padoł, Roman | pl_PL |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2019-09-17T12:21:53Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2019-09-17T12:21:53Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2002 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Annales Academiae Paedagogicae Cracoviensis. 10, Studia Philosophica 1 (2002), s. [21]-28 | pl_PL |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11716/5849 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Lutosławski's settlement of the chronology of Platon’s writings has made him a well known philosopher. However,
hegave it the secondary meaning. The correct chronology was supposed to fix this final Platon’s opinion, which
would be recognized as the most mature expression of his thoughts. The spiritualism - according to Lutosławski -
had to be the Platon’s philosophy, accepting autonomous ego as the basic component of reality. But Lutosławski
accepted messianism, also, which the spiritualistic concept of an ego connects with an idea on essential function
of a nation as a factor of conditioning consciousness and history. | en_EN |
| dc.language.iso | pl | pl_PL |
| dc.title | Spirytualizm i mesjanizm Wincentego Lutosławskiego | pl_PL |
| dc.title.alternative | Wincenty Lutostawski's spiritualism and messianism | en_EN |
| dc.type | Article | pl_PL |
