Dlaczego "zawsze fragment"?
| dc.contributor.author | Burkot, Stanisław | pl_PL |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2019-10-01T13:48:12Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2019-10-01T13:48:12Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2004 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Annales Academiae Paedagogicae Cracoviensis. 20, Studia Historicolitteraria 4 (2004), s. [47]-58 | pl_PL |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11716/6032 | |
| dc.description.abstract | In Tadeusz Różewicz’s poetic output, since its beginnings, the principle of “a fragment” was of primary importance. After the disaster of the World War II, it was impossible to create a holistic vision of the world in literature and art. The “mirror” of human perception was broken and no whole could be seen. The poet should nevertheless try to make attempts at collecting the broken picture in spite of the fact that he is always doomed to “a fragment”. | en_EN |
| dc.language.iso | pl | pl_PL |
| dc.title | Dlaczego "zawsze fragment"? | pl_PL |
| dc.title.alternative | Why "always a fragment"? | en_EN |
| dc.type | Article | pl_PL |