| dc.description.abstract | Technical errors that occur when a medium is used, as well as logical or cognitive errors,
are commonly seen as challenges and obstacles in a creative process. Technical
proficiency has been an indispensable and celebrated aspect of artistic practice
from the very beginning of its modern history, indeed, its very essence, persistently
inhabiting the language used to describe popular and admired artworks. Terms
such as “masterpiece” and “Kunstwerk”, although fully meaningful when used in the
context of the master-apprentice guild system of the pre-modern times, when repetition
and imitation were prevailing methods of education, still define the linguistic
and mental universe of values through which art is perceived and assessed.
Meanwhile, the history of 20th-century art, but also a broader history of human
progress, the advancement of science and developments in technology, have
shown us that to attain proficiency or mastery one must follow established criteria.
But to make a breakthrough, to push the boundaries forward, one must take a path
previously untrodden, by conscious choice but also by sheer mistake. Numerous
achievements are made incidentally, that is, by accident, on the margin of conducted
research and investigations, along the route taken to reach a different goal.
In visual art, errors can also offer a source of inspiration and an insight into otherwise
unknown reality. Very often, they are made outside the author’s awareness,
yet with the support of the viewer, who shows the courage to act against traditions
or established rules. The artist’s certainty about his or her intentions, and the viewer’s
openness, seem necessary for their communication to succeed. But the way art
is experienced often runs against the author’s concept and contrary to the viewer’s
expectations.
In the 20th and 21st century, the reliance of art on the criteria of mastery and
technical perfection have been called into question on numerous occasions and from
a variety of perspectives, from the postulates of de-professionalisation advanced by
Jean Dubuffet and the Art Brut movement and the notion of “de-skilling” recurrent
in recent practices, through the Post-Structuralist investigations of slips, omissions,
and unconscious errors, to the queer politics that favours failure over perfection
and indeterminacy over clear-cut categories. To a large degree, the dynamics of the
development of contemporary art has relied on moments when the very logic of
success and failure, hit and miss, was called into question. Moments when artists refused
to let artistic practice be swallowed up by the overriding pressure of success,
quantifiable in the capitalist categories such as profit and progress and – instead –
allowed themselves to fail, err, or disappoint.
In this volume, authors are interested in the discrepancies that occur between
the intention and effect of actions undertaken by artists and researchers. Thus
described approach determines the illusion and uncertainty that reveal themselves
en route to experience and intellectual cognition. They examine the anxiety or even
true fear of making a mistake, which makes an impact on immediate and distant
future, but also the pleasure that errors may bring. The notion of error and its economy
is analysed in a broad theoretical context (historical, cultural, philosophical,
sociological, and political), as something as yet unrecognised – potential obstacle or
side effect that will bring unexpected results. | en_EN |
