Uwagi o roli murów w modelowaniu rzeźby Karpat
View/ Open
Author:
Ziętara, Tadeusz
xmlui.dri2xhtml.METS-1.0.item-citation: Rocznik Naukowo-Dydaktyczny. 1974, Z. 55, Prace Geograficzne 6, s. 5-41
xmlui.dri2xhtml.METS-1.0.item-iso: pl
Date: 1974
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
During the recent twenty years the Carpathians suffered from several floods which in some Carpathian basins were of
a disastrous nature. They have not only resulted in relief re-modelling, but caused also enormous damages of the
technical site infrastructure. Morphological effects of the floods have been worked out many times and T. Ziętara
(1968) has not only compiled earlier investigations of the violent rain-storms and floods course in the Flysch
Carpathians, but he has also presented (1972 and 1974) erosion and denudation rates, as well as the forecasts of
the Flysch Carpathians modelling during floods. The site investigations conducted during the freshets and floods by
the members of the Department of Geography of Cracov Paedagogical College discovered some processes and forms which
had not been included in the earlier scientific bibliography concerning Carpathians relief. These Alps, Caucasus,
Tiań-Szań or Pamyr. The author has got to know these processes during his mountain expeditions in Tiań-Szań,
Caucasus and Alps. Comparative investigations and observations have been also conducted in Slovakian and Roumanian
Carpathians. During the investigations the interpreting of air-pictures has been utilized.
In the first part of his paper the authors discusses a morphological sense of erosion.
Later he passes to a relation of energy distribution to transfer intensity, whilst in the third part, which is the
most comprehensive one, he discusses the mudflows (mura) effect on Carpathians relief modelling. T. Ziętara was the
first to observe and to describe these processes in 1958—60 and he called them stone-mudflows or mud-stoneflows
according to the prevalent material (rubble or mud) which is displaced down the slopes and then down the valleys.
The author discerns four Carpathian levels where these processes occur, i.e. the highest, the intermediate, the
middle and the lowest one.
The highest level (above 1800 m) principally coincides with the moderate — cold and cold horizon of cooms and
crags. The intermediate level (1400 to 2200 m) is situated on various heights in each mountain group) the High and
Low Tatras, Babia Góra Mountain, Big and Small Fatra, the Gorgany and Czarnohora, the Fagaroskie Mountains).
Weathering gravity (agradation) as well as weathering-scree slopes occur mostly in this level. Huge packedrock
landslides and rocky brashes are also encountered. The level includes also a big accumulation of moraine deposit in
mountain ranges locally glaciated in Pleistocene. In the intermediate level there is the biggest accumulation of
loose deposits susceptible to the displacement by mudflows.
The middle level (from 800 to 1800 m) is covered by lower and higher prealpine forests. In Polish Carpathians, the
birthplace of the mura in this level (the Beskidy) are mostly steep valley closures digitally cut by V-shaped
valleys covered by colluvial deposits, rubbles and rock brashes which had arisen due to a mechanical weathering or
to a development of packed-rock lanslides.
The lowest level slope inclination ranges from 20 to 45°. The slopes are covered by weathering crusts of
solifluction, colluvial and proluvial origin. In general, the clay material is prevailing over the rubble one in
the crusts. The mura appear in this level only occasionally and as mudflows mainly. In the plateau and foreland
level (up to 500 m) the mura do not appear, since they are not favoured by small slope inclinations.
Two types of mura occur in the Carpathians: turbulence and structural. Turbulence mura are more frequent. Liquid
phase is then prevailing over a solid one. Structural mura appear seldom in the Carpathians and their formation is
associated to disastrous rainfalls only. A moving mass behaves like a plastic or semi-plastic body. Only 30 to 40
per cent of this mass is water, the other 60 to 70 per cent being clay and rock-blocks. Three displacement stages
are identified by the author within structural mura:
1. Preliminary stage where water reanimates the movement of a plastic-liquid mass along an inclined plane.
2. Proper displacement stage where water acts as a catalyst of the movement of solid body and makes it behave like
a plastic mass which is not only able to overcome friction on the subgrade but has also an enormous destroying
force.
3. Final stage where accumulation is caused by the slope decrease and not by a lack of proper water amount.
In the Carpathian Mountains, mura occur occasionally, primarily during disastrous rain-storms and floods. They may
appear occasionally in the mountain zone during a sudden melting of the snow cover. They are modelling steep
weathering slopes, as well as weathering-gravity (agradation), weathering scree, solifluction, and colluvial slopes
and higher parts of considerably inclined valleys, the inclination often exceeding 100 per cent.
Wide flat — bottomed valleys inclined more than 30 per cent are modelled by turbulence mass only exceptionally (the
Southern Carpathians), while structural mura do not appear in these valleys. Mura arise mostly in the intermediate
level where the biggest accumulations of displacement-susceptible sediments are deposited along steep slopes and
mountain-sides.
Mura are an intermediate link between landsliding and fluvial processes. Although the frequency of their occurrence
is rather occasional, their effect is enormous, often disastrous. One more question arises. Perhaps the deposits in
higher valley parts in the stream-bed zone having a structure and texture much alike to a material accumulated by
the mura, which are believed to be solifluction crusts and thus described on geomorphological maps, can be really
attributed to mura activity in Holocene climatic optimum?