Tożsamość interakcyjna. Szanse i ograniczenia indywidualistycznego modelu socjalizacji w Polsce
View/ Open
Author:
Karnat-Napieracz, Anna
xmlui.dri2xhtml.METS-1.0.item-citation: Annales Academiae Paedagogicae Cracoviensis. 35, Studia Sociologica 1 (2006), s. [58]-67
xmlui.dri2xhtml.METS-1.0.item-iso: pl
Date: 2006
Metadata
Show full item recordDescription:
Dokument cyfrowy wytworzony, opracowany, opublikowany oraz finansowany w ramach programu "Społeczna Odpowiedzialność Nauki" - modułu "Wsparcie dla bibliotek naukowych" przez Ministerstwo Nauki i Szkolnictwa Wyższego w projekcie nr rej. SONB/SP/465103/2020 pt. "Organizacja kolekcji czasopism naukowych w Repozytorium UP wraz z wykonaniem rekordów analitycznych".Abstract
The article discusses the issue of constructing the interactive identity in the context of the systemic changes
which took place in Poland after 1989. The transformations of the social, cultural and political system, and the
new principles of organization of the social life almost in all its aspects, seem to be conducive to popularization
of the individualistic model of socialization. That in turn, implies different conditions of creation of the
interactive identity, which is clearly visible on different levels of social interaction.
Furthermore, three threads are subject of the analysis: processes of individualization, as basic to the
reconstruction of interpersonal relationships (including socialization relationships), four socialization
interaction planes on which individual identities are constructed, as well as the chances and threats created by
the democratization and liberalization of the relationships in the state for the achievement of optimum
socialization results.
The connection between the individual and institutional dimension appears to be the key issue here. It is so,
mainly due to the fact that the progress of subjectivization of individual actions frequently encounters the
institutional inertia, also of the traditional socialization instances. Moreover, in the scope of individualistic
actions, suitable patterns of conduct in relation to institutions have not been formulated. Thus, successful
generation of interactive identities depends less on strengthening the sphere of individual actions, but more on
working out proper coexistence of individuals and social institutions.