Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKozaryn, Dorotapl_PL
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-13T09:28:50Z
dc.date.available2022-09-13T09:28:50Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationAnnales Universitatis Paedagogicae Cracoviensis. 306, Studia Linguistica 15 (2020), s. [145]-153pl_PL
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11716/11270
dc.description.abstractThe article discusses a selected group of metatextual comments made in the 3rd edition of Marcin Bielski’s Kronika published in 1564. The analysis focuses on those referring to the contents of his Chronicle, i.e. the comments informing about what Bielski has already written and where he has written it, what he is about to mention, what and for what reason has been omitted or added by the author when compared to his sources, and what he has only treated superficially. A review of the variety of the linguistic methods used for constructing these metatextual comments allows for disclosing the possible motivations behind the writer’s choices: his wish to direct the reading process and to lead the reader into assuming that the presented content is credible and accurate, combined with an educational and moralistic drive.en_EN
dc.language.isoplpl_PL
dc.subjectjęzykoznawstwo diachronicznepl_PL
dc.subjectpolszczyzna XVI w.pl_PL
dc.subjectuwagi metatekstowepl_PL
dc.subjectidiolekt Marcina Bielskiegopl_PL
dc.subjectdiachronic linguisticsen_EN
dc.subject16th century Polishen_EN
dc.subjectmetatextual commentsen_EN
dc.subjectMarcin Bielski’s idiolecten_EN
dc.titleO czym nie napisał Marcin Bielski, czyli o pewnym rodzaju uwag metatekstowych w Kronice, to jest historyi świata (1564)pl_PL
dc.title.alternativeWhat Marcin Bielski did not write about, or on a certain type of metatextual comments made in Kronika, to jest historyja świata (1564)en_EN
dc.typeArticlepl_PL


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record