Pokaż uproszczony rekord

dc.contributor.authorOżdżyński, Grzegorzpl
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-22T07:20:50Z
dc.date.available2024-04-22T07:20:50Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.identifier.citationAnnales Universitatis Paedagogicae Cracoviensis. 96, Studia Logopaedica 4 (2011), s. [396]-404pl
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11716/13121
dc.description.abstractThe pragmatic function of irony is to signalize the valuation—mainly negative valuation. Ironic mockery appears generally in the form of expressions of praise, but implying a negative judgment. The form of the expressed “on the surface” (alleged) fake interest in the student’s problems aims to hide the derisive assessment or latent rebuke—in the form of a “therapeutic” question added in the course of teacher’s reasoning. In the context of school conversations the ironic utterances of teachers are subject to distinctive reassessment— either towards persuasion (negative valuation, scolding, admonishing, calling to order), or more tactful, polite (appeasing the difficult situation in a humorous way), talking about some inconvenient issues in a more gentle way, with a view to the effectiveness in solving problems that arise in school communication.en
dc.languageplpl
dc.language.isoplpl
dc.titlePytania typu: Agnieszko, masz problem?! – w dyskursie szkolnympl
dc.title.alternativeQuestions such as: Agnieszka, is there a problem?!, in Ironic Contexts of the School Discourseen
dc.typeArticlepl


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord