Jeszcze o aoryście w staropolszczyźnie

dc.contributor.author	Deptuchowa, Ewa	pl_PL
dc.date.accessioned	2019-06-12T10:56:58Z
dc.date.available	2019-06-12T10:56:58Z
dc.date.issued	2017
dc.identifier.citation	Annales Universitatis Paedagogicae Cracoviensis. 234, Studia Linguistica 12 (2017), s. [61]-66	pl_PL
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/11716/5145
dc.description.abstract	An analysis of examples of the past perfect tense composed of a singular and plural past tense participle and an aorist form of the ‘to be’ verb in the singular third person form used as an auxiliary word is given in the article. The author, referring to the research of W.R. Rzepka, presents three consecutive examples from the mediaeval court oaths, where the aorist by has the meaning of ‘był’ (past form of the to be verb in Polish).	en_EN
dc.language.iso	pl	pl_PL
dc.subject	aoryst	pl_PL
dc.subject	czas zaprzeszły	pl_PL
dc.subject	staropolskie roty przysiąg sądowych	pl_PL
dc.subject	aorist	en_EN
dc.subject	plusquamperfectum	en_EN
dc.subject	mediaeval oath courts	en_EN
dc.title	Jeszcze o aoryście w staropolszczyźnie	pl_PL
dc.title.alternative	Once more on aorist in the Old Polish	en_EN
dc.type	Article	pl_PL