Pokaż uproszczony rekord

dc.contributor.authorKleszczowa, Krystynapl_PL
dc.date.accessioned2019-06-13T08:02:21Z
dc.date.available2019-06-13T08:02:21Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationAnnales Universitatis Paedagogicae Cracoviensis. 234, Studia Linguistica 12 (2017), s. [140]-147pl_PL
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11716/5154
dc.description.abstractThe text is a complementation of a reflexion on the evolution of Polish adjectives with emphasis put on intermorphs. The issue seems important for the conclusion of the morphological construction of contemporary lexemes. The following issues guided the choice of intermorphs: 1/ It sometimes happens that an intermorph is an innovation in the time span from Old Polish to later ages, while the sources of this innovation have common points. Should intermorphs be divided on a basis of series in every case? The problem has been examined on an example of intermorphs -al-, -ar- before the suffix -ny. 2/ How much should historical conditions decide on a division of modern lexemes into morphemes? The issue is being examined in an assessment of the status -l- in the suffix -liwy. We hope that both the synchronic and diachronic approach to language will be included in the works on the Polish Morpheme dictionary (Author’s postulate).en_EN
dc.language.isoplpl_PL
dc.subjectmorfotaktykapl_PL
dc.subjectintermorfpl_PL
dc.subjectmorfempl_PL
dc.subjectzmiany językowepl_PL
dc.subjectmorphotacticsen_EN
dc.subjectintermorphen_EN
dc.subjectmorphemeen_EN
dc.subjectlanguage changesen_EN
dc.titleMorfotaktyka polskich przymiotników z perspektywy historycznejpl_PL
dc.title.alternativeMorphotactics of Polish adjectives from the historical perspectiveen_EN
dc.typeArticlepl_PL


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord