Problemy czytelnictwa w prasie polskiej w latach 2004–2005
View/ Open
Author:
Ippoldt, Lidia
xmlui.dri2xhtml.METS-1.0.item-citation: Annales Academiae Paedagogicae Cracoviensis. 61, Studia ad Bibliothecarum Scientiam Pertinentia 6 (2008), s. [105]-121
xmlui.dri2xhtml.METS-1.0.item-iso: pl
Date: 2008
Metadata
Show full item recordDescription:
Dokument cyfrowy wytworzony, opracowany, opublikowany oraz finansowany w ramach programu "Społeczna Odpowiedzialność Nauki" - modułu "Wsparcie dla bibliotek naukowych" przez Ministerstwo Nauki i Szkolnictwa Wyższego w projekcie nr rej. SONB/SP/465103/2020 pt. "Organizacja kolekcji czasopism naukowych w Repozytorium UP wraz z wykonaniem rekordów analitycznych".Abstract
Readership is becoming a widespread and disturbing problem, especially in Poland. It
turns out that not only adult Poles read less, but a decrease in readership has recently been observed
also among children, even those younger than 15. Therefore, perhaps, much is written
about the problem, attempts are made to appeal to librarians to propagate books, and new ideas
of librarian work, especially with children and youth, are proposed. This is clearly noticeable
in the press. Over two years (2004-2005) The National Library registered a total of 247 articles
on readership. They were published both in librarian professional journals or local librarian
press, and in ordinary dailies. Also pedagogical magazines published articles on the subject.
Finally, the gravity of the problem is shown by the fact that it was devoted some attention even
by scientific journals.
Proportionally, most space was dedicated to readership of children and youth (42 titles,
which makes 17% of all analyzed publications), propagating readership (37 titles – 15%) and
forms of work with the reader (36 titles – 14.6%). This may result from the necessity to undertake
actions directed particularly at the youngest, who may still be won to be included in the
group of actual readers. The suspicion that adult readers have been forgotten is confirmed by
the negligible number of articles devoted particularly to them (merely 5 titles, which is 2% of
all texts).