Argumentacja i błędne rozumowanie w perspektywie pragmatycznej (w opracowaniu Louise Cummings)

Abstract

The paper is focused on application of different frameworks for research into argumentation to analyses of educational discourse. Six frameworks (semantic, epistemic, dialectical, psychological, rhetoric, and pragmatic ones) considered by Louise Cummings were taken into account. Both argumentation and fallacies of reasoning were discussed. The pragmatic method of analysis seems to be the most appropriate for an educational discourse that is a kind of everyday linguistic practice. The method allows to analyze arguments in context and reveal different disorders of argumentation.