Foto-teksty? W poszukiwaniu narzędzia analizy współczesnej artystycznej fotografii dokumentalnej
Oglądaj/ Otwórz
Autor:
Michałowska, Marianna
Źródło: Annales Universitatis Paedagogicae Cracoviensis. 103, Studia de Cultura 2 (2011), s. [15]-26
Język: pl
Słowa kluczowe:
fotografiastudia wizualne
fototekstualność
photography
visual studies
phototextuality
Data: 2011
Metadata
Pokaż pełny rekordOpis:
Dokument cyfrowy wytworzony, opracowany, opublikowany oraz finansowany w ramach programu "Społeczna Odpowiedzialność Nauki" - modułu "Wsparcie dla bibliotek naukowych" przez Ministerstwo Nauki i Szkolnictwa Wyższego w projekcie nr rej. SONB/SP/465103/2020 pt. "Organizacja kolekcji czasopism naukowych w Repozytorium UP wraz z wykonaniem rekordów analitycznych".Streszczenie
A term "photo-text" emphasizes a contemporary change in visual culture researches, where
photography is a link between a photographed object and its cultural meaning. In a book titled
“Phototextuality” Andrea Noble and Alex Hughes stated that phototextuality plays “between
the culturally fabricated nature of photographic artifact and its fundamental indexality, that
is, its status as a trace of the real; and evidential manifestation of what has been”. Photo-texts
characterised by critical, self-reflective and intertextual attitude towards culture go together
with contemporary interests with narration, memory and history.
The text is divided into few parts. I consider a status of phototextuality in the first one and
present basic researches on textuality of photography in the second. I compare Roland
Barthes’s analysis to a John Berger’s and Jean Mohr’s project there. Part three is dedicated to
visual studies, where phototextuality is a field of discussion with models of art and popular
culture (on an example of Gregor Brandler work). Finally, in the fourth part a critical attitude
of photo-texts towards history is presented. In conclusion, photo-texts are regarded as an
effective tool of contemporary culture analysis, both on the level of its production and on
“reading” level. This reading is not a “free” or “mis” –reading, that tears the meanings off the
objects of reference, but rather which “anchorages” those meanings in represented object.