Pokaż uproszczony rekord

dc.contributor.authorChęciek, Mieczysławpl_PL
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-24T14:44:05Z
dc.date.available2019-09-24T14:44:05Z
dc.date.issued2006
dc.identifier.citationAnnales Academiae Paedagogicae Cracoviensis. 31, Studia Logopaedica 1 (2006), s. [522]-539pl_PL
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11716/5991
dc.description.abstractThe author makes results of studies on language development by C.E. Hamre (1984) a starting-point of his own considerations to the sphere of normal fluent speech development as opposed to stutter (non-fluent) speech development. Definitions of both language and stutter taking from eleven different conceptual language models were compared, e.g. 1) the behavioural model: stutter is classically and/or instrumentally conditioned behaviour; 2) the pragmatic model: stutter differs in communicative features from fluent speech; 3) the cognitive model: stutter reflects wrong functioning of cognitive processes; 4) the linguistic (structural) model: stutter is limited using of phonological and prosodic rules; 5) the neurological model: stutter reflects occasional inability to process language rules and/or requirements of performance. The sociological, general, semantic (logic), psychoanalytical, statistical, and cybernetic models of language were also discussed. Results of experimental studies are (and will be) used in speech therapy through facilitation of diagnosis and prognosis. They may also be of some advice to conduct therapy.en_EN
dc.language.isoplpl_PL
dc.titleJąkanie - zaburzeniem kognitywno-lingwistycznympl_PL
dc.title.alternativeStuttering as a cognitive and linguistic impairmenten_EN
dc.typeArticlepl_PL


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord