Telewizyjne gry z Pirandellem
View/ Open
Author:
Łubieniewska, Ewa
xmlui.dri2xhtml.METS-1.0.item-citation: Annales Universitatis Paedagogicae Cracoviensis. 228, Studia Historicolitteraria 17 (2017), s. [135]-149
xmlui.dri2xhtml.METS-1.0.item-iso: pl
Subject:
nowatorstwomit
recepcja
prawda
iluzja
maska
teatralność
zbiorowość
stereotyp
władza
szaleństwo
innovation
myth
reception
truth
illusion
mask
theatricality
collectivity
stereotype
power
madness
Date: 2017
Metadata
Show full item recordDescription:
Dokument cyfrowy wytworzony, opracowany, opublikowany oraz finansowany w ramach programu "Społeczna Odpowiedzialność Nauki" - modułu "Wsparcie dla bibliotek naukowych" przez Ministerstwo Nauki i Szkolnictwa Wyższego w projekcie nr rej. SONB/SP/465103/2020 pt. "Organizacja kolekcji czasopism naukowych w Repozytorium UP wraz z wykonaniem rekordów analitycznych".Abstract
In the beginning of 1960s, the Polish press witnessed a discussion on Pirandello’s right
for innovation, which was started by Zygmunt Greń who harshly attacked the writer for
„pseudointellectualism” and using the metaphor of a mask as an empty stage effect. At the
same time, however, in Polish theatres, the author witnessed great prosperity. This included
also Teatr Telewizji (Television Theatre) which in the course of 30 years showed his most
important plays, i.e.: Six Characters in Search of an Author, Henry IV, Right You Are (If You
Think So), and comedies The Man, the Beast and the Virtue, Cecè, Il berretto a sonagli, The Man
with the Flower In His Mouth, and Tutto per bene.
When analyzing two of them – Right You Are (If You Think So) from 1967 directed by Ireneusz
Kanicki and Henry IV directed by Maciej Prus and shown as late as 1989 – it should be noted
that in both plays political undertones could be noticed. A characteristic interpretative
feature of adaptations of Pirandello in Polish theatres was the manifestation of the “role”
his characters are doomed for, which happens at the price of their internal truth. Society,
often using the institutions of power, tries to trespass the intimate space in order to conform
it to predictable stereotypes uncovered by – real or pretend – “madness” of Pirandello’s
characters. Both Right You Are (If You Think So) and Henry IV gave us two different faces of
resistance of an individual in the context of pressure of collectivity, regardless of whether it is
governed by institutions or stereotypes of worldview.
Even though in the contemporary (almost non-existent) Teatr Telewizji it is difficult to
imagine new adaptations of the author’s plays, in spite of gloomy prognosis of criticism, Polish
theatres are still interested in the author. Six Characters in Search of an Author treating about
a destruction of subjective structure and attempts of rebuilding it is especially constantly
present in theatre programme. The play was even used in an experiment with theatre therapy
in Lublin – a disabled group prepared the production.
Therefore, maybe the Italian Nobelist still has a lot to offer to contemporary theatre?