„Przemówił dziad do obrazu” – historia pewnej polemiki
View/ Open
Author:
Sadlik, Magdalena
xmlui.dri2xhtml.METS-1.0.item-citation: Annales Universitatis Paedagogicae Cracoviensis. 263, Studia Historicolitteraria 18 (2018), s. [113]-120
xmlui.dri2xhtml.METS-1.0.item-iso: pl
Subject:
theatrethe interwar period
theatre critics
avant-gard
Date: 2018
Metadata
Show full item recordDescription:
Dokument cyfrowy wytworzony, opracowany, opublikowany oraz finansowany w ramach programu "Społeczna Odpowiedzialność Nauki" - modułu "Wsparcie dla bibliotek naukowych" przez Ministerstwo Nauki i Szkolnictwa Wyższego w projekcie nr rej. SONB/SP/465103/2020 pt. "Organizacja kolekcji czasopism naukowych w Repozytorium UP wraz z wykonaniem rekordów analitycznych".Abstract
The following paper is a recollection of a series of articles by Tadeusz Kudliński, published
in ”Ilustrowany Kurier Codzienny” (1936–37). “Teatralne mielizny” were very popular with
readers, especially young playwrights, supported by the critic. The articles written by the
Cracow „teatrał” (theatre man) aroused a heated discussion in the press, and the initiative to
create Studio 39 can be regarded as its aftermath. Contrary to previous assurances concerning
the final conclusion of the ”sandback” dispute, Kudliński took up the topic again nine months
after the publication of the last part of the series, and his text “Przemówił dziad do obrazu”
provoked the response by Tadeusz Boy-Żeleński. Thus, the whole discussion on the articles,
as well as the theatre initiative brought to life by their soul, ends with three polemical texts,
published in press, whose main character has, unexpectedly, become the hero of an old Polish
proverb.